• Replies 13 replies
  • Subscribers 2 subscribers
  • Views 19 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Related

Do you let technicians self-schedule, or is everything dispatcher-controlled?

Deja Washington

Hi everyone! Hope you're all having a great week so far!

So our team has been growing (we're up to 14 techs now!) and I'm wondering if we should start letting our senior technicians do some of their own scheduling. Right now I control everything from the dispatch board — who's going where, what order, the whole thing. It's worked fine but honestly it's getting to be a lot, especially when I'm out sick or on vacation and someone else has to cover.

I've heard some teams let techs claim open jobs or move things around within their own routes, and I'm curious how that works in practice. Does it actually save time or does it just create chaos? What about when customers request specific techs — do you let the tech handle that directly?

Really appreciate any insights! We're trying to figure out what "good" looks like as we scale up. Thanks so much in advance!

Parents

  • Another way to think about this is around capability building rather than just efficiency.

    We've found that technicians who participate in scheduling decisions develop stronger customer relationship skills and better time management. They start thinking like business owners, not just employees. The operational benefit is real, but the cultural impact may be even more significant over the long term.

    That said, we implemented this gradually — first with our most tenured technicians, then expanded based on demonstrated performance. It was not an overnight change, and we maintained dispatcher oversight for complex or high-value jobs throughout.

  • in reply to Nadia Petrov

    Nadia's gradual rollout is smart — we basically did the same thing without calling it that. Started with two senior techs, added a third when one retired, now we're at five self-scheduling with the rest still dispatcher-assigned.

    What's interesting is the self-schedulers started coaching the others on route efficiency without us asking. Created this knowledge transfer that wouldn't have happened if I was still the bottleneck.

Reply
  • in reply to Nadia Petrov

    Nadia's gradual rollout is smart — we basically did the same thing without calling it that. Started with two senior techs, added a third when one retired, now we're at five self-scheduling with the rest still dispatcher-assigned.

    What's interesting is the self-schedulers started coaching the others on route efficiency without us asking. Created this knowledge transfer that wouldn't have happened if I was still the bottleneck.

Children
No Data