Handle parts returned after job completion?

Quick question on the parts workflow — when a tech brings back unused materials from a job, what's the best way to get those back into inventory without creating a mess in the records?

Right now we're seeing two issues:

  1. Techs are just dumping returns on the shelf and telling someone later, which means our counts are off until someone remembers to update FieldPulse
  2. When we do try to adjust, we're not sure if we should edit the original work order or do a separate inventory adjustment

We want clean reporting on what was actually used vs. what was allocated, but we also don't want to overcomplicate things for the techs in the field. Curious how others are handling this — especially if you're tracking costs closely.

Side note: we do use the parts reservation feature for upcoming jobs, so anything that plays nicely with that would be ideal.

Parents
  • Thanks both — Art, that "no adjustment no pay" policy is aggressive but I get why it works. We're not quite there culturally but I like the clarity.

    Priya, the note about not editing the original WO is exactly the kind of thing I was looking for. We were definitely leaning toward that and it's good to have confirmation that it breaks reporting.

    One follow-up: is there any way to run a report showing all adjustments linked to a specific work order? Or do we need to rely on the notes field being searched?

  • Hey Gwen — good follow-up. Currently the work order number in the notes field is your best bet for traceability. There's not a direct linked report from work order → adjustments, though you can filter the Inventory Adjustment Report by date range and reference text.

    What I've seen teams do is use a consistent format like "Ret: WO-12345" in the notes, which makes searching cleaner.

    I've flagged this as a feature request to the product team — linking returns directly to the originating WO would be useful for sure.

Reply
  • Hey Gwen — good follow-up. Currently the work order number in the notes field is your best bet for traceability. There's not a direct linked report from work order → adjustments, though you can filter the Inventory Adjustment Report by date range and reference text.

    What I've seen teams do is use a consistent format like "Ret: WO-12345" in the notes, which makes searching cleaner.

    I've flagged this as a feature request to the product team — linking returns directly to the originating WO would be useful for sure.

Children
No Data